В этом выпуске: сезон advent-календарей, React 19, Vite 6, TypeScript 5.7, Firefox 133, React Router 7, Astro 5 и Deno 2.1. Да, в этом выпуске много мажорных релизов. Кроме них мы, конечно, затронем интересные материалы: посмотрим на классный пример небольшого опенсорса, новые фичи CSS 2024 года, просветимся в теме создания современных пакетов, посмотрим на создание эффекта матового стекла и приобщимся к созданию плагинов для Obsidian.

---

**T**hose days when you could seriously argue whether it’s a bad or a good idea to bring outsourcers in your business are gone. Now the question is different: how to choose an outsourcing team so as to get maximum benefit and minimum risks. 
First of all, you should consider from where exactly this team will be working.

If you classify outsourcing by location, you can distinguish three main types:

- A team works together with yours in the same office. All communications — face to face, external and internal developers participate in meetings and brainstorms together.
- A team works from its own office. Communication within the team takes place offline, and interaction with your team are done through regular meetings and the Internet.
- A team is fully distributed, all interaction is remote.

Each type has its own peculiarities. At a contractor’s search stage, your key task is to correctly define the terms of interaction with the future outsourced team and select the most suitable way of working so that these features become advantages.

If one collects opinions about working with outsourced teams from different companies, he or she can learn that sometimes the same initial conditions may result in the opposite outcomes. Some say that a fully distributed outsourced team shows a higher result than a team working from an office. Others recall their experience with remote developers as a complete failure, but note the increase in productivity after inviting the outsourcers to work in their office. The easiest way is to blame the professionalism of the outsourced team for everything. But in fact the truth is that the environment and conditions play a significant role in how effectively a team can work. Let us look into what those conditions are and how to take them into account when choosing a contractor.

<ParagraphWithImage imageName="skydiving-people">
## Team Goals
The correctly defined goals are 90% of success. Make your mind what you would like to achieve outsourcing some job from your in-house IT department: to speed up on-going development, to launch a new one, or to ease the pressure on the supporting team of an already operating product.

In any case, it is important to remember that it will take time for a new team to adapt to your processes and get familiar with the context. The more “legacy” there is in the tasks they will have to perform, the longer this period will be. In critical situations, it can be greatly reduced by placing the developers in the epicenter of events right in the office. This is especially true for a pre-release stage products or those at support, i.e. in all cases when information exchange between yours and the outsourced team should be as fast as possible. However, if you are only planning to launch development, this option may bring no benefits, as new information will be distributed as it generated, but the office costs will certainly increase.
</ParagraphWithImage>

<ParagraphWithImage imageName="skydiving-man">
## Special Teams
If you need a team of HTML developers to quickly launch a batch of typical landings, you can find suitable candidates almost anywhere in the world. But if you’re looking for developers with deep expertise by choosing a team to be located in the office, you limit your choice. Professional distributed teams are able to recruit the best specialists from all over the world, which means you can engage in your project, for example, five signor-developers within one team.
</ParagraphWithImage>

## Company Procedures

You would like the outsourced team to follow your internal procedures. The following shall be taken into consideration:

- Level of control. If your management keeps a strict record of all your employees’ activities, and this is critical for you, the most convenient option would be an outsourced team working in your office. Alternatively, desktop monitoring systems for employees can be considered, but such solutions are often expensive and greatly reduce motivation.
- Well-tuned, clear and structured processes. The clearer the mechanisms within your team work, the less risk of losing time, data and information when working with outsourcers. In small teams, where processes are not yet regulated, outsourcers working close to their office colleagues will be able to handle tasks more efficiently.
- Documentation. Although a project coverage with up-to-date and comprehensive documentation is the generally recognized best practice, reality is not ideal. If your project lacks well-functioning documentation support — the farther the developers are from the team, the more painful their work will be.
- Main communication channels. Take note how your employees communicate. Nowadays, many companies use messengers and video communication inside the office — it is quick, convenient, saves the history of communication, and does not knock out of the “stream” the developers deeply immersed in the problem. If this is your story, then the connection with a distributed team will go seamless. And vice versa, teams that meet three times a day in a meeting room will hardly work smoothly with remote developers or a team from another office.

These points are a “quick test” of your in-house IT department’s readiness for expansion through outsourcing. In order to get the full picture you need to analyze a lot more factors and we’re ready to help with that. Email us and we will give you free advice on all the particulars of connecting the outsourcing team to your development.

One argument against outsourcing often heard from CTOs or team leaders is that “our processes are not adapted to include outsiders at all”. Unfortunately, sometimes this is really true.

The good news is that including the team “inside” your processes is not always necessary. If it has to work on the whole project or the selected particular parts, so you can organize the work in the way that the teams are synchronized only at key points. Experienced professional outsourced teams do not need to be controlled at every stage.

There’s a security issue worths mentioned separately. We can assume that distributed teams definitely lose out when it comes to working on projects that require a high level of data access control. But in reality, it’s a question of experience and the right tools: we’ve been working with banks and companies dealing with cybersecurity for many years and have learned to adjust to almost any requirements.

<ParagraphWithImage imageName="laptop-work">
## Project Completion
Any project comes to an end at some point and at that point one have to decide what to do with the people who no longer have assignments. Having an outsourced team is like an insurance against the necessity to fire or transfer employees to other departments. The costs of “shutting down” distributed teams or those in own office are lower — one doesn’t have to think about abandoned workplaces, passes cancellation and empty spaces. This also applies to putting work on hold: for your in-house developers such standstill is often too much to bear and it is definitely expensive for you.
</ParagraphWithImage>

## Costs

Often the choice of outsourcing development is a choice in favor of economy. In this light, distributed teams look the most advantageous: it is cheaper to have them, and therefore the cost of hiring them is much lower. However, recruiting a team with its own office also creates a lower financial burden than your office outstaffing.

So, to sum it up.

<Table color='purple' withBorders>
 <thead>
 <tr>
 <th />
 <th>Your office outstaffing</th>
 <th>Outsource in its own office</th>
 <th>Distributed team</th>
 </tr>
 </thead>
 <tbody>
 <tr>
 <th colspan="4" data-text="Aim">Aim</th>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th>Emergency help to your project</th>
 <td>++</td>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>-</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th>Development support or upgrades with new functions</th>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>+</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th>Launch of new development</th>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>+</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th colspan="4" data-text="Specialists Qualification">Specialists Qualification</th>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th>Regular specialists</th>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>+</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th>Unique specialists</th>
 <td>--</td>
 <td>-</td>
 <td>+</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th colspan="4" data-text="Processes">Processes</th>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th>Firm control</th>
 <td>++</td>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>-</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th>Strict processes</th>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>++</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th>Documentations</th>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>++</td>
 <td>++</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th>Personal communication</th>
 <td>++</td>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>-</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th>Communication via messengers</th>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>++</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th>Security concerns</th>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>+</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th colspan="4" data-text="Miscellaneous">Miscellaneous</th>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th>Project completion</th>
 <td>-</td>
 <td>+</td>
 <td>+</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <th>Low cost</th>
 <td>--</td>
 <td>-</td>
 <td>++</td>
 </tr>
 </tbody>
</Table>

There are no one-size-fits-all solutions, but proper planning and risk assessment at the start of cooperation will help avoid many mistakes. Be honest with yourself and the team your hired — this will make your outsourcing experience the most productive.

How Close Your Outsourced Team Should Be Located? Pros and Cons

<Subtitle>
Cost-effectiveness, high-quality services and other reasons why so many Singapore entrepreneurs are looking into offshoring web development services
</Subtitle>

---

**W**eb development outsourcing has become an extremely popular trend in Singapore and worldwide. Standing behind it are the reduction and transparency of costs, the improvement of of service/code quality, financial flexibility and the ability to focus on core business projects. When it comes to offshore web development outsourcing, IT companies from Singapore definitely have a great choice, though it is difficult to decide on the best place to outsource web development.

Aside from geographical location and time differences, outsourcing destinations are usually characterized by numerous criteria: tech-literacy and qualification, service costs, communication skills, legal and intellectual property protection, etc. East European countries, like Ukraine and Russia, are well known for being the top destinations for web development outsourcing services in Singapore. Their Asian contenders are India, Indonesia, China and Vietnam. Read on to find out their pros and cons.

<ParagraphWithImage imageName="india">
## India

India is one of the top choices for web development outsourcing globally. Nowadays, it is the world’s second-largest English-speaking country with mature IT industry, developed IT infrastructure, educated urban population and a huge number of IT professionals.

Indian companies offer various solutions and services, ranging from system migration, maintenance and integration, to web and application development, while the biggest advantage associated with web development outsourcing to India is low pricing. An average hourly rate for a web developer in India is extremely low.

Still, outsourcing to India is a controversial issue since Indian contractors are very different, and you can never predict what quality level you will get. In certain cases, customers have to re-order services due to code imperfection. The code can contain numerous bugs, which are difficult or even impossible to fix, and cannot be further maintained and developed. Some of the best Indian web development enterprises can deliver good results. Yet, the finest quality always requires the best and the most expensive workforce, which affects the overall pricing.
</ParagraphWithImage>

<div class="compare">
pros: low rates, nearshore
cons: unpredictable quality, future refactoring costs
</div>

<ParagraphWithImage imageName="china">
## China

China is the second most popular web development outsourcing destination behind India. The country is a powerhouse for math science both in primary and high schools, resulting in many young specialists obtaining high-quality programming skills. Chinese IT companies provide Singapore outsourcers comparatively fine code quality and a lower cost option for their web development services.

However, the wages of Chinese web developers are increasing, which makes the pricing higher than the rest of Asia. Besides, despite the high overall literacy rate in China, the number of English speaking people is still low which can create a certain communication barrier. Yet another weakness of the local market is China’s discretion on intellectual property. This can lead to code ownership and updating issues if not previously discussed or legally secured.
</ParagraphWithImage>

<div class="compare">
pros: lots of good programmers, nearshore
cons: language barrier, dealing with chinese laws on intellectual property transferring
</div>

<ParagraphWithImage imageName="indonesia">
## Indonesia

India is one of the top choices for web development outsourcing globally. Nowadays, it is the world’s second-largest English-speaking country with mature IT industry, developed IT infrastructure, educated urban population and a huge number of IT professionals.

Indian companies offer various solutions and services, ranging from system migration, maintenance and integration, to web and application development, while the biggest advantage associated with web development outsourcing to India is low pricing. An average hourly rate for a web developer in India is extremely low.
</ParagraphWithImage>

<div class="compare">
pros: fast growing market
cons: currently relatively small pool of programmers
</div>

<ParagraphWithImage imageName="vietnam">
## Vietnam

Modern-day Vietnam is a country continuously growing to become one of the most prominent destinations on the web development outsourcing market. Two factors have normally contributed to that: skilled and productive labor force plus low costs. Both are making Vietnam a powerful IT hub and a front-runner in this offshore outsourcing race among the Asian countries.

As experienced Vietnamese developers came back from abroad, bringing their knowledge back home, the quality of web development services in Vietnam increases. On the other hand, lack of expertise in code reviewing and QA engineering creates a gap, that outsourcers have to cover.
</ParagraphWithImage>

<div class="compare">
pros: growing market of good programmers, low costs, nearshore
cons: undeveloped market , lack of expertise in related areas such as QA
</div>

<ParagraphWithImage imageName="europe">
## Eastern Europe

Eastern Europe also ranks as the leading and promising destination for web development outsourcing with Ukraine and Russia being the top choices.Ukraine is gaining popularity as an outsourcing country that has plenty of skilled tech talents and engineering expertise. With relatively low hourly rates, Ukrainian companies deliver a wide range of web development outsourcing services, including turnkey solutions.

Web developers and engineers from Poland and Bulgaria also demonstrate good professional skills and are able to produce fine code quality, good testing services and ongoing support. Both countries attract tech students from all over Europe and excel at high web development, QA and usability standards.

Countries such as Belarus, and, most commonly, Russia are becoming widely recognized for their sustainable tech growth and adoption of the latest IT technologies. Russian web development companies got used to follow global trends making a strong emphasis on web development: front-end skills, Java, Ruby and PHP programming are well-established areas contributing to the increasing number of successful web projects there. That is why more companies from Asia (China, South Korea, Singapore) and Western Europe tend to export their web development and programming services to Russian enterprises.
</ParagraphWithImage>

<div class="compare">
pros: top-ranked programmers, competitive prices
cons: offshore, language barrier
</div>

<ParagraphWithImage imageName="summary">
## Summary

Offshore web development is an important IT segment: it costs less, there are more talents available, and they are often more qualified than locals. Singapore clearly lacks IT talents to address the growing needs of its IT industry and chooses to outsource web development offshore. Today the national IT market is characterized by the rising demand for professional tech teams that can handle numerous tasks and reduce spending.

Steadily playing a bigger role in the offshore web development segment, Eastern Europe is turning into a more cost-effective alternative compared to the Asian-Pacific region. Moreover it rightfully boasts a higher quality-price ratio. Eastern Europe does provide the best IT infrastructure, code and service quality, data protection, at costs competitive to that of Asian countries like India, China, Indonesia and Vietnam.

The downside of working with Asian (especially Indian or Chinese) companies is that sometimes there are no guarantees as to the work’s quality provided. Other frequent problems with offshore contractors can include lack of non-local customers’ legal protection, difficulty to get justice in the local courts, bureaucracy, documentation or even tax issues. The best way out of that is to have a Singapore local contractor with an advanced chain of offshore web developers. CSSSR PTE. LTD., being local headquarters of international web developers mostly domiciled in Russia and Eastern Europe, can serve as the best choice in this regard. The company can address the specific demands of local customers, offer custom-built solutions, and offer at the same time the highest quality combined with highly competitive pricing.
</ParagraphWithImage>

Offshore Web Development: Top Destinations For Singapore

<Subtitle>..and why partnerships are better than IT departments or subcontracting.</Subtitle>

---

**W**eb development and creative design have always gone hand-in-hand. In the beginning, websites and internet traffic were relatively simple, with only basic code and designs, and limited specialization. Simply put, there wasn’t much thought putinto making websites truly high performance. However, times have changed, and each field has become increasingly competitive. As budgets for web development have swelled, the challenge of bringing together creative agencies and web developers has become more important.

The history of digital advertising is a gradual trend towards increased specialization. At first, large companies wanted a full-service provider, so they typically turned to major advertising agencies to give them the full spectrum of communications services. Originally, there were two classifications for these services, above-the-line (ATL), focussing on a broad range of customers, or the more targeted below-the-line (BTL), appealing to specific groups. At first, digital advertising was grouped in with BTL, but over time digital advertising became a separate field in its own right. Now, when a company seeks an advertising agency, they look for ATL, BTL and digital.

Web development is also becoming more and more sophisticated and, with it, budgets for digital promotion have been growing. As the field has developed, specialization has increased, with some companies offering specialized creative services and others, web development, because it is no longer efficient for creative agencies to hire internal developers and build a management model for IT teams.

<Img imageName="swing" alt="swing" withBigMargin />

## Web Development Options for Creative Agencies

### Option 1: Internal IT Department

What are the main challenges of building your own IT department? Well, it takes time to set up a reliable and skilled IT team and significant investment to support it. Additionally, the team needs to have a wide range of skills so that it can handle specialized requests. The agency may instead have to hire or train additional team members for each assignment, which can be time-consuming and expensive.

So, often developing internal technical skills is a less-than-appealing idea for creative agencies. However, the good news is that when agencies choose to forgo developing their own IT departments, there are several alternatives, better models for web development services:

<ParagraphWithImage imageName="clockwork-bird">
### Option 2: Subcontractor / Freelance
While a simple solution, subcontracting or hiring freelancers lacks predictability and transparency. To win tenders and avoid losing clients, companies often understate costs, without bothering to understand the actual expenses and labor required. Only after they win the bid do they start thinking about who they could give the project to at the price they negotiated.
</ParagraphWithImage>

Reputable agencies refuse to work under these conditions, while freelancers might agree to just about any project, even unfeasible ones. Misjudging their own expertise, resources and time, freelancers tend to place the burden of responsibility for possible issues on the agency and end-client.

Alternatively, and less pessimistically, an experienced agency might design an appropriate campaign, but make a poor choice of developer, something difficult to avoid if you use a different contractor for each project. As a result, the end-customer gets a strong creative idea, with poor implementation and/or a postponed launch date.

<ParagraphWithImage imageName="horse-man">
If you, as a client, are offered development work by an agency through a subcontractor, we recommend you instead take on the task of finding a suitable contractor yourself. Try to find a separate contractor for the web development part of the project, compare the expertise levels of different teams and choose the best one for you. Tech recruiters can be helpful for this task, as they have plenty of experience in identifying tech talent.
</ParagraphWithImage>

The same advice rings true for creative agencies as well: whenever possible don’t work with subcontractors. By hiding the real provider, you’re signing yourself up for all the risk if something goes wrong. Even if your creativity is excellent, you run the risk of damaging your reputation with low-quality development that you can’t control.

### Option 3: Alliance

While possibly a less obvious approach, establishing an alliance is more stable and predictable. Instead of trying to use a new partner for each project, major creative and web development companies can look to team up with each other for a long-term alliance. In these types of alliances, the companies will typically partner with the other for each project, which brings added continuity and reliability. Alliances also take out the need for companies to seek out new contractors for each project, saving time and resources.

Additionally, when working in an alliance, creative agencies do not have to budget for additional risks connected to contractors, because the web development company typically has its own terms with the client. This means there is less risk for the creative agency in an area that isn’t its focus. The same goes for the web developer, which doesn’t need to answer for design and branding elements.

A good alliance can work for nearly any project, with few exceptions is specific cases. For instance, the company requesting the service might have its own internal capabilities in a given field, or want to work with another partner, or some specialized skill or knowledge might be required for a particular project. However, for the most part, well formed alliances have clear advantages over the subcontractor / freelance model.

<Img imageName="men-in-boat" alt="men-in-boat" withBigMargin/>

## The Rules of a Good Alliance

Creative agencies and web development companies that are seriously considering alliances should keep in mind these four keys to success:

### 1. Both teams must be engaged from start

The main advantage of an alliance is the ability to complement each other’s expertise. While working in tandem, web developers can advise creative agencies early on about what ideas might significantly increase project costs and suggest how to implement them in a more cost-effective way.

Web developers can also advise on which technologies are best suited to a particular project and which would be best to avoid. For example, some projects require costly support of outdated web browsers that few customers would actually use. Costs to support an old browser could amount to a 30% increase in the total cost of the project, while only applicable for a net increase in customers of 0.5%. Of course, the client might decide it still wants to go ahead with supporting the browser, but if both the creative team and the web development team are included in the conversation from the start, the vision will be clearer.

Web developers’ experience can also help more accurately project and meet the client’s deadlines. For instance, if a project needs to be ready for a seasonal peak in activity such as Summer vacations or Autumn fashion, then both teams can be consulted in determining which technologies and designs can be implemented in time.

### 2. Create a transparent system for estimating time and costs

Web developers can provide two types of estimates depending on the availability and quality of source materials: upper-limit and detailed. If a project is ready for implementation, including layouts, functional requirements and an understanding of start and end dates, the developer can provide a more precise estimate, say 5-6 weeks.

On the other hand, if a client needs an early-stage valuation and understanding of which concepts to choose, web developers can give an approximate estimate (e.g. 1-3 months), which will help the creative agency and client to formulate and justify the budget. These kinds of valuation can significantly change after the details of the project become clearer.

### 3. Give each team freedom and flexibility

One of the main advantages of an alliance is that the partners clearly understand the expertise of the other and can vouch for the quality of the end-product. Additionally, each company is free to form several partnerships and choose between them for each project based on the specifications, expertise and strengths of the partner. This approach results in the best possible quality and value for the end-client. However, this also means that signing exclusivity agreements does not make much sense, because a partner’s expertise may not be applicable for some projects.

### 4. Don’t limit yourself geographically, think globally

You can build a successful alliance with a partner from any country. What is more important is understanding that creative agencies should consider the specific features of each country and region. It can be challenging to build an idea that will be successful in an unfamiliar market if your team is immersed in the specifics of its local market. For this reason, it is often best to seek out partnerships with creative agencies based close to clients and who speak the same language, with deep understanding of the local market.

Web development agencies, on the other hand, can be based on different continents, with little-to-no specification for local markets, because code is written in the same languages all over the world and differences in mentality have little effect on end results.

<Img imageName="high-five" alt="high-five" withBigMargin/>

**In conclusion,** when these four rules are followed, alliances between creative agencies and web developers can be the most efficient and effective way for clients to develop their digital presence. Keep them in mind when forming partnerships between web developers and creative design teams, and you will find success in your future projects.

How to Integrate Creative and Web Development

---

**E**stonia enjoys the reputation of a genuinely digital society. Today, it is Europe’s most ambitious country in terms of technological and IT development. Most of government services are delivered 24/7 and have been digitally linked across one platform, while blockchain technology is often used to secure data integrity. Estonia has the largest number of IT startups per capita, while the alumni of two leading Universities are behind the world-famous tech companies that have changed the market. Let’s have a look at the numbers that make the country claim it is the real E-success and IT leader.

<Img imageName="flag" alt="flag" withBigMargin/>

## Europe’s most developed IT sector

Estonia is one of the smallest European countries with a population of <a href="https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/estonia-population/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">1,3 million people</a>. However, it is well known for its enormous contribution to the mass adoption and development of various IT solutions. Estonian IT industry, despite its comparatively small share in the global market, has certain well-developed segments. The overall contribution of the national IT sector to the country’s GDP is estimated at 4%.

The emerging strengths of Estonian IT industry include numerous technological solutions offered to the companies and organizations operating in the financial, governmental and cyber security sectors. As of the mid-2017, Estonia had almost 23 thousand of IT professionals, a relatively large number for a small European state. Today, the country’s IT market is receiving an increasing attention from both tech specialists and companies.

What makes Estonia progressive are the governmental initiatives aimed at the extended use of its developing IT industry. Everything is being turned electronic — legislation, voting, education, healthcare, banking, justice, tax systems, etc. E-Residency, a digital platform launched by the Estonian government 5 years ago, is possibly the best known example. Through this platform, residents of other countries get access to a range of government services provided to domestic population.

In 2019, Estonia is anticipated to issue <a href="https://e-estonia.com/digital-nomads-visa-shape-urban-employment/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">the first visa for “digital nomads”</a>, allowing top talents from around Europe, and beyond, to take on business and working opportunities for 12 months. By now, Estonia has shared its e-governance experience with <a href="https://e-estonia.com/it-sector/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">60 governments</a> and exported its solutions to over 130 countries worldwide.

## The ambitious startup community

Digital society has also fostered a culture of innovative tech companies. The country’s ambitious startup community has turned Estonia into one of the top countries that have the most established startups (from Fintech to Greentech and beyond) per capita than anywhere else in Europe.

According to statistics from the <a href="https://www.emta.ee/eng" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Estonian Tax and Customs Board</a>, in 2018, Estonian startups <a href="https://www.startupestonia.ee/blog/2018-records-for-the-estonian-startup-sector-new-wave-of-entrepreneurs-in-the-community" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">employed 3763</a> specialists in their offices in Estonia, an increase of 26% compared to 2981 people in 2017. Same year, the annual turnover generated by the Estonian startups has reached €299 million, which is 9% above the 2017 level (€275 million).

In 2018, the total investments attracted by the Estonian startups have reached almost €328 million. The largest investment so far (€150 million) was made into <a href="https://bolt.eu/ru/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Bolt</a> (one of Uber’s competitors), then followed by <a href="https://www.pipedrive.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Pipedrive</a>(€43 million + €8,7 million), <a href="https://monese.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Monese</a> (€51,6 million) and <a href="https://www.starship.xyz/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Starship Technologies</a> (€21,4 million).

At the moment, there are <a href="https://e-estonia.com/it-sector/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">4800 IT companies</a> doing business in Estonia that can be segmented by three core types: purely Estonian; Estonian eventually becoming international (local startups that attracted foreign investments); purely international.

## At the top of tax competitiveness rating

Another attractive thing about Estonia is the progressive and competitive tax system. Startups allocating investments to the growth and development of the company, are authorized to pay 0% taxes. This initiative seeks to develop private businesses and stimulates the inflow of small and medium enterprises to the country. In 2019, Estonia reached the highest position in the rating of the world’s most competitive tax systems released by <a href="https://taxfoundation.org/2019-international-index/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">The International Tax Foundation</a>.

The score in the given index was achieved through a 20% corporate profit tax (applied to distributed profits only), a 20% tax on individual income (not applying to personal dividend income), and a property tax applied to the land’s value only. Foreign profits earned by local companies are also exempted from the profit taxation.

<Separator type="color-line" lineColor="#D3D3FF" imageName="manWithCafeBg" imageTitle="manWithCafeBg" />

## Homegrown IT minds and scholars

Most professionals employed in the Estonian IT field are the graduates from the University of Tartu (UT) or the Tallin Tech University (TalTech), while TalTech’s School of Information Technologies is home to around 70% of all Estonian IT students.

Scientists from the UT specialize in deep learning, machine learning, artificial intelligence, cryptography, etc. The UT alumni are behind the global tech companies, like <a href="https://www.skype.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Skype</a> (video chatting service), <a href="http://www.playtech.ee/?nav=index&lang=en" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Playtech</a> (gaming industry’s leading software supplier), <a href="https://transferwise.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Transferwise</a> (money-transfer service) and <a href="https://www.jrebel.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">JRebel</a> (a software company).

TalTech is active exploring software development, computing systems design, biorobotics and biomedical engineering, cybersecurity. Scholars from TalTech have founded companies like <a href="http://testonica.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Testonica Lab</a> (electronics manufacturing), <a href="https://www.funderbeam.com/startups/optofluid-technologies" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Optofluid Technologies</a> (online sensors for dialysis machines), <a href="https://guardtime.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Guardtime</a> (cybersecurity solutions).

## Just the beginning

Surely, the way to become a digital society in Estonia was challenging. In 2007, the state suffered a severe cyber attack which has affected and almost completely disabled some segments of its digital infrastructure. There were many other challenges the government has wrestled to make a tiny Baltic country one of the most tech-savvy societies in the world. Estonia has undertaken a range of reforms designed to guarantee a complete modernization of a national economy. As a result of its commitment to innovation, you can use medical e-prescriptions, file taxes, or even buy a car online.

The country now represents a benchmark of a well-built digital society. Some say, that Estonia is running its country like a tech company. True. Yet, this is just the beginning of a long journey, as more tech companies from Estonia are exploring the most trendy technical segments, with Big Data, AI, AR/VR and cyber security among others.

Outsourcing is another trend to follow as it opens new ways to eliminate weaknesses of in-house project development. <a href="https://loremscriptum.com/#about" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Outsourcing in the IT world</a> has proved extremely popular due to its economic advantages, and Estonia is not an exception in this respect. As the national IT sector grows, the country will need more professional IT talents, including back-end and front-end developers, computer and data scientists, top JavaScript specialists, etc.

The Baltic E-Success: A&nbsp;Brief Introduction to&nbsp;the Estonian IT&nbsp;Industry

---

**W**ebsite (or&nbsp;web application) development strategies have been evolving continuously over the past decade. Today, web development companies fall into two broad groups&nbsp;– full-stack agencies and specialized, or&nbsp;niche, agencies. The first category, still dominating the Asian market, consists of&nbsp;full-service agencies used to&nbsp;offer a&nbsp;wide range of&nbsp;services (from back-end and design, to&nbsp;front-end development and&nbsp;QA), while specialized agencies are offering a&nbsp;limited range of&nbsp;services focusing on&nbsp;specific kind of&nbsp;works. Nowadays, it&nbsp;is&nbsp;a&nbsp;common practice worldwide to&nbsp;divide the development process into two parts. There are several reasons behind&nbsp;it, however, the key question is&nbsp;whether it&nbsp;is&nbsp;a&nbsp;good idea to&nbsp;have front-end part separated for a&nbsp;product.

## Specialize to&nbsp;stand out

When we&nbsp;started our web development business back in&nbsp;2012, we&nbsp;have decided to&nbsp;take on&nbsp;a&nbsp;specific front-end development niche. We&nbsp;narrowed our position to&nbsp;only work within this certain market segment and put all of&nbsp;our resources into the offering of&nbsp;high-end services to&nbsp;help fulfil the specific needs of&nbsp;our customers.

Narrowing the service offerings helped&nbsp;us to&nbsp;be&nbsp;more productive and earn a&nbsp;strong reputation in&nbsp;the industry (Russia and CIS countries). Focusing on&nbsp;a&nbsp;few niches instead of&nbsp;taking on&nbsp;most of&nbsp;them allowed&nbsp;us to&nbsp;specialize and become well-known for being experts in&nbsp;a&nbsp;particular type of&nbsp;web development.

Further in&nbsp;this article, we’ll focus on&nbsp;the advantages and some disadvantages of&nbsp;a&nbsp;separate front-end development model. These are based on&nbsp;our expertise in&nbsp;general and our observations made while exploring the Asian market.

<Img imageName="process" alt="process" withBigMargin />

## Two main approaches to web development

The front-end side of&nbsp;a&nbsp;website or&nbsp;web app is&nbsp;the part that is&nbsp;built to&nbsp;interact with users directly. Front-end developers are responsible for the user interface while full-stack development includes both front-end and back-end programming focusing on&nbsp;business logic, data models among other things. Hence, full-stack development represents the complete web development process.

Full-stack development has become popular across various countries worldwide, including Singapore and other Asian states. This is&nbsp;mainly because frequent problems in&nbsp;development are said to&nbsp;come from the lack of&nbsp;interaction between front-end and back-end development teams. It&nbsp;is&nbsp;believed that front-end developers are not always fully informed about changes in&nbsp;the back-end and API or&nbsp;vice versa. When distributed development teams are working in&nbsp;different time zones, this also becomes an&nbsp;issue.

It&nbsp;is&nbsp;also generally believed that a&nbsp;full-stack team, or&nbsp;an&nbsp;agency, addresses a&nbsp;wider range of&nbsp;problems and solves most of&nbsp;them before they even happen. Such agencies have fewer interaction issues and have a&nbsp;team of&nbsp;specialists working well together.

A&nbsp;full-stack development approach is&nbsp;something that lots of&nbsp;companies got used to&nbsp;for large and complex projects, and many of&nbsp;them accepted this approach and have been satisfied with&nbsp;it. At&nbsp;the same time, more companies are reluctant to&nbsp;use&nbsp;it. With the emergence of&nbsp;high-performance technologies, more of&nbsp;the processing power can be&nbsp;handled by&nbsp;web browsers, which allows to&nbsp;move away from this “united” (full-stack) model and define a&nbsp;conceptual split of&nbsp;front-end from back-end development and other things.

<Separator type="bg-repeat" lineColor="#D3D3FF" imageName="peopleWithGramophone" />

## Benefits of separated front-end development

We&nbsp;have outlined a&nbsp;number of&nbsp;features of&nbsp;a&nbsp;split-stack approach to&nbsp;web development (with a&nbsp;dedicated front-end team), as&nbsp;well as&nbsp;its benefits that should be&nbsp;considered.

Independent technology stacks. The separation of&nbsp;front-end development from other tasks helps to&nbsp;eliminate all the restraints on&nbsp;technology choices that each may have imposed on&nbsp;the other. This leads to&nbsp;the use of&nbsp;completely independent stacks, that could have been difficult or&nbsp;impossible to&nbsp;implement in&nbsp;a&nbsp;universal model. Such approach allows to&nbsp;choose the best technologies for a&nbsp;given project.

Simultaneous development and fast deployment. With front-end and back-end split, both layers can be&nbsp;developed independently and simultaneously. As&nbsp;neither stack is&nbsp;reliant on&nbsp;the other, the front-end code can be&nbsp;tested and deployed whenever it’s done, with API endpoints brought together in&nbsp;the end. Besides you can make a&nbsp;new front-end part, integrate it&nbsp;with an&nbsp;old back-end part, and upgrade each independently further&nbsp;on.

Modularity. By&nbsp;having front-end separated, it&nbsp;is&nbsp;much easier to&nbsp;work on&nbsp;one module keeping the other one untouched. Two teams can work on&nbsp;front-end simultaneously at&nbsp;a&nbsp;different pace and without messing up&nbsp;with each other.

Simple scaling. Keeping the front-end development separate can lessen the chances of&nbsp;breaking the entire website during the scaling process that follows. Further debugging would be&nbsp;easier as&nbsp;you would already define whether it’s a&nbsp;front-end issue or&nbsp;something else. Moreover, transferring, partially, the logic from back-end to&nbsp;front-end can simplify the scaling process, while reducing hardware load (coming from the increasing number of&nbsp;users) and OPEX.

Deeper understanding. Full-stack agencies are the jack of&nbsp;all trades, and master of&nbsp;none, as&nbsp;the proverb goes. It’s more difficult for a&nbsp;full-stack agency to&nbsp;dig deeper into any of&nbsp;the front-end issues. They have little to&nbsp;no&nbsp;time for exploring something new and gaining wider expertise in&nbsp;everything they do&nbsp;or&nbsp;they can even outsource parts of&nbsp;the project.

Cost-effective. Finally, when it&nbsp;comes to&nbsp;hiring a&nbsp;full-stack development agency, one should get ready to&nbsp;pay more since these agencies have higher expenses which force them to&nbsp;imply higher costs on&nbsp;the end-customers. Companies offering dedicated front-end development services do&nbsp;not spend more on&nbsp;hiring full-stack developers with higher salary rates. Besides, finding a&nbsp;jack of&nbsp;all trades itself is&nbsp;famously challenging in&nbsp;the tech industry.

## Conclusion

These are only a&nbsp;few of&nbsp;the advantages of&nbsp;a&nbsp;split-stack development model but it&nbsp;can be&nbsp;extended to&nbsp;include a&nbsp;much wider array of&nbsp;benefits. We’re not suggesting that there are no&nbsp;cons of&nbsp;buying front-end development services separately (the above-mentioned project management issues, which may cause bugs or&nbsp;progress and a&nbsp;bit more of&nbsp;paperwork), but they are far and few as&nbsp;compared to&nbsp;the pros.

Niche specialization is&nbsp;simply that good. Just like we&nbsp;prefer a&nbsp;specialized doctor or&nbsp;lawyer for a&nbsp;specific problem you should hire a&nbsp;specialized company for handling each layer of&nbsp;the development. A&nbsp;full-stack model is&nbsp;a&nbsp;common approach for the Asian market, however, a&nbsp;split-stack can be&nbsp;viewed as&nbsp;a&nbsp;rising trend, that will be&nbsp;spreading in&nbsp;the Asian region over the next years.

Split-Stack Web Development: Some Advantages of&nbsp;Separating Front-end from Back-end

---

In the picture down below is Stonehenge, one of the most famous architectural monuments in the world!

<Img imageName='stonehenge' alt='Stonehenge photo' />

<Caption size='s'>
 © 2007 by thegarethwiscombe
</Caption>

It's hard to find anyone who hasn't heard of Stonehenge, yet nobody can say for sure what was the original purpose pursued by the ancient people who built it. In fact, the scientists would be grateful for any text or graphical description from the builders of this monument.

When it comes to “Stonehenges” in a codebase, it can be a great architectural solution that we use every day, building a whole system on top of it without really understanding why we or previous developers built it as they did. Perhaps, they had their reasons, but these are now completely irrelevant. We can't be sure.

However, a lack of understanding regarding the original reason behind implementing a specific element can lead to an occasional increase of complexity.

## The importance of documentation

While many developers truly enjoy making and working with projects that have good documentation, they still tend to feel reluctant to write it. This paradox of a situation exists despite us, developers, understanding the importance of documentation. Still, the difficulty of writing and supporting a detailed description of the code does bear its burden. But is there a way to make it easier? I think there is! Let me show you it in this article!

[<Img imageName='tweet-about-documentation' alt='A tweet about documentation' />](https://twitter.com/mit_csail/status/1405559612326105090?s=28)


## Main problems of documentation writing

The main problem and, perhaps, the root of the rest of the problems is the separation of code and documentation. When we write our code and documentation in different systems (e.g. GitHub and Confluence), we have two different versioning systems for code and documentation. But what does this mean? Well, it can lead to the growth of project support complexity. For instance, every single change in a source code should be manually synchronized with documentation, while every single change in the documentation is to be connected to the source code.

This complexity often stops people from writing documentation at all, they may ask, "Why should we spend our time trying to write documentation for a project in development status?", adding, "We'll write the documentation when we get the completed product". This is possible, but, unfortunately, in real life, a "completed" project is a dead project. All live projects are in continuous development status. Thus, the only way to have good documentation is to write it in parallel with development, making this process as easy as possible with minimal overhead.


Take for example this, at different times and in different places, developers tried to solve this. For instance, Racket language has its own way to keep source code and documentation as close as possible by using [Scribble](https://docs.racket-lang.org/scribble/), which allows us to integrate Racket code, including evaluating it inside the documentation:

```racket
#lang scribble/manual
@(require (for-label racket))
 
@title{My Library}
 
An example of the Racket code:
 
@racketblock[

(define (nobody-understands-me what)
 (list "When I think of all the"
 what
 "I've tried so hard to explain!"))
(nobody-understands-me "glorble snop")

]
```

In another example, if you're an Emacs enthusiast, you can use the awesome tool/language called [Org Mode](https://orgmode.org/), which allows one to write complex documents, evaluate source code of different programming languages, and use the [Literate Programming](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literate_programming) paradigm to keep all your source code within the documentation. Here's an example from its home page.

```org
#+title: Example Org File
#+author: TEC
#+date: 2020-10-27

* Revamp orgmode.org website

The /beauty/ of org *must* be shared.
[[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bd/Share_Icon.svg]]
** DONE Make screenshots
 CLOSED: [2020-09-03 Thu 18:24]

** DONE Restyle Site CSS

Go through [[file:style.scss][stylesheet]]


** TODO Check CSS on main pages 

* Learn Org

Org makes easy things trivial and complex things practical.

You don't need to learn Org before using Org: read the quickstart
page and you should be good to go. If you need more, Org will be
here for you as well: dive into the manual and join the community!
 
** Feedback

#+include: "other/feedback.org*manual" :only-contents t
* Check CSS minification ratios

#+begin_src python
from pathlib import Path
cssRatios = []
for css_min in Path("resources/style").glob("*.min.css"):
 css = css_min.with_suffix('').with_suffix('.css')
 cssRatios.append([css.name,
 "{:.0f}% minified ({:4.1f} KiB)".format( 100 *
 css_min.stat().st_size / css.stat().st_size,
 css_min.stat().st_size / 1000)])
return cssRatios
#+end_src

#+RESULTS:
| index.css | 76% minified ( 1.4 KiB) |
| org-demo.css | 77% minified ( 2.8 KiB) |
| errors.css | 74% minified ( 4.9 KiB) |
| org.css | 75% minified (10.7 KiB) |
```

Org Mode is a great solution if your team is familiar with Org Mode and Emacs. Even Github supports Org Mode, and you can use `*.org` files instead of `*.md` ones.

On the other hand, another problem arising from the separation of code and documentation is the weak cohesion between code and documentation parts. For example, we can describe a feature in our system, but every single part of the description is about different parts in our source files. This issue leads us to an inability to update certain parts of documentation after changing files connected to the source code or editing specific parts of those source files. Vice versa, while reading documentation, it's difficult to quickly find related source code for a certain paragraph of documentation. Without solving this issue, the complexity of documentation support will grow increasingly with the growth of project size.

But you may disagree and say, "That’s not true.Our API documentation doesn't have problems like that!" and you'll be right! You don't have such problems with API documentation or your Storybook documentation because it's generated from source code or with huge involvement of your source code in it. It has strong cohesion with source code and uses the same version control system as your source code. The only way to make writing project documentation easier, is to use the same set of tools as for code writing.

You can still solve this issue with tools like Scribble or Org Mode, but you'll need to combine different parts of documentation manually, which can be hard in big projects.

## Documentation as code

Keeping documentation and code together allows to achieve better control of changes and to make support of documentation easier. But without proper tools, it can be awkward to work with documentation for anybody other than the developers. For example, we can use markdown files for writing documentation, but if we place them near related source files, it will be difficult for managers, analysts, QAs, and designers to find something in this documentation. On the other hand, if we place them into a separate directory with its structure, we will not solve the issue with weak cohesion. In addition, with markdown files, we can't automatically create references from `*.md` files to particular parts of a source file, or we can't automatically combine all `*.md` files about the whole feature but written in the perspective of different source files. Let's look at the following example:

```bash
.
└── src
 ├── api
 │ ├── auth.js
 │ ├── news.js
 │ └── offers.js
 ├── components
 │ ├── auth.js
 │ ├── header.js
 │ ├── news.js
 │ └── offers.js
 ├── index.js
 └── reducers
 ├── auth.js
 ├── news.js
 └── offers.js
```

The example shows a simple project. Let's imagine we want to write documentation for our `auth` feature. The whole feature is implemented in three different files, but by "auth's implementation", all source files, not only `api/auth.js` or `components/auth.js`. So, to achieve strong cohesion between code and documentation, we should somehow place different parts of an article about authentication in different files and generate a single article from these parts.

If we do that, and even better, we add links to source code from a generated article, we can solve both problems with weak cohesion and using different versioning tools. But it'll still be a little awkward to use because good documentation should allow you to search through it and edit it.

## The solution

I tried finding something which could solve all of these problems, but unfortunately, I hadn't found it. So I wrote my own tool called [Fundoc](https://github.com/CSSSR/fundoc) to achieve all described goals and even more. The tool can:

- Keep documentation and source code as close as possible.
- Use the same version control system for documentation as for code.
- Be language agnostic.
- Collect all documentation from different repositories in one particular place.
- Allow non-programmers to read and write documentation.

So what can Fundoc do? It can generate documentation in two formats: raw markdown files (maybe later I'll add Org Mode support) and [mdBook](https://github.com/rust-lang/mdBook). The main idea behind this tool is to be as straightforward and uncomplicated to use as possible while providing all of the required functionality like search through documentation, documentation editing without the necessity to know the structure of a project, using one version control system, and so on.

<Img imageName='fundoc-example' alt='An example that shows how Fundoc generates documentation from different files' />

But what do I use to keep the simplicity of a tool and the possibility to work with it for non-programmers? I use Github, that's it. Of course, in the future, it's possible to extend support of different services like GitLab, Bitbucket, or something like that. Let me explain how it works. Developers write documentation in source files or in markdown files marking every single documentation part with a simple marker that describes a result article title such as:

```javascript
// src/api/auth.js

/**
* @Article Authentication
*
* To get authenticated, you should use the `login` function, which returns auth-token to pass it with API requests that require authentication.
*/
const login = (username, password) => {
 // some code here
}

/**
* @Article Authentication
* 
* To log out, use the `logout` method. It will invalidate the auth-token and delete it from cookies.
*/
const logout = () => {
 // some code here
}
```

And some description for a UI-part:

```javascript
// src/components/header.js

const Header = props => {
 const { isUserAuthorized } = props
 
 /**
 * @Article Authentication
 *
 * Only authorized users can see their balance in the header
 */
 return (
 <div>
 ...
 {isUserAuthorized && <UserBalance />}
 ...
 </div>
 )
}
```

This rather simple example will be compiled into one markdown file:

```markdown
# Authentication

To get authenticated, you should use the `login` function, which returns auth-token to pass it with API requests which require authentication. [[~]](https://github.com/username/repository/blob/master/src/api/auth.js#L3-L7)

To log out, use the `logout` method. It will invalidate the auth-token and delete it from cookies. [[~]](https://github.com/username/repository/blob/master/src/api/auth.js#L12-L16)

Only authorized users can see their balance in the header. [[~]](https://github.com/username/repository/blob/master/src/components/header.js#L6-L10)
```

> To see more realistic documentation examples you can check out [documentation of Fundoc itself](https://csssr.github.io/fundoc/) or [another project](https://github.com/CSSSR/linters) that used Fundoc.

In the compiled markdown file, you can see references to the particular parts of the source code. It allows you to find the exact source of every single part of the documentation. It can be useful for non-programmers if they want to edit documentation. If you believe they should still work with git to push their changes, they actually should not. Here's the example of editing documentation in the repository of Fundoc:

![Process of documentation editing](/images/dont-resize/en/problems-with-documentation-writing/fundoc-gif/all.gif)

So on the gif, we can see that the only thing we need to edit our documentation is GitHub itself. Yes, it still requires an understanding of what GitHub is and the fundamental terms like "commit" and "branch". As practice shows, QAs, managers, designers, and analysts can handle it without any problems. At the same time, this way of working with documentation doesn't require knowing the file structure of a project from non-developers. It's definitely much easier than working with CLI-tools and dramatically easier than trying to synchronize Confluence and source code.

At the end of the article, I wanted to remind you that Fundoc now is in the beta state, and some APIs can change in the future. Otherwise, it already solves many problems and is used in different projects, so you can try to use it as well. If you have any questions or suggestions, feel free to send me them via Github issues or PRs. I'll be glad to make it better with your help!

It's hard to find anyone who hasn't heard of Stonehenge, yet nobody can say for sure what was the original purpose pursued by the ancient people who built it. In fact, the scientists would be grateful for any text or graphical description from the builders of this monument.

Problems with documentation writing

---

**F**irst and foremost, you should know that there’s no one right way to build a website. What you use in the end all depends on your needs and business demands. Sometimes a basic HTML site is all you need, other times you may need to develop a completely bespoke site to appeal to your customer base, while standard CMS sites allow you to make basic updates easily.

To help you decide which web development strategy is best for you, let’s look at the advantages and disadvantages of each.

<ParagraphWithImage imageName="html">
## HTML

Description: HTML sites are best for the most basic types of sites. Static in nature, they offer a quick and cheap way to build an online presence that you can use to market your company. Development skills for this type of website are relatively simple, meaning you can hire a relatively junior developer to maintain the site as you grow. However, HTML really only works for smaller sites, and isn’t an effective tool for e-commerce. To get an idea of how much it would cost to build a basic HTML site, you can use this quick calculation tool.

Pros: cheap, quick to build, low level programming skills to update

Cons: static website that requires programming skills to update, can’t be used for e-commerce, difficult to use for complex sites.

Who it’s best for: companies looking for a basic online presence with company description and contact details.
</ParagraphWithImage>

<ParagraphWithImage imageName="cms">
## Standard CMS

Description: A Content Management System (CMS) website is quite simple to set up. There are standard site layouts that you can purchase and you can buy a design to fill it in. You can hire a company to do this for you, but they’ll charge quite a high premium to develop them for you. However, CMS sites can be good for standard e-commerce sites, and it can be useful to hire a developer to help you with this. You should also remember that because most e-commerce sites have some custom elements, CMS is usually best for MVPs, while you’d have to hire a developer to build your final product from scratch.

Another key advantage to CMS sites is that once you’ve set them up, you can change content relatively simply, although if you want to make major changes, you’ll need a custom site. Standard CMS can also be useful for blogs, because the content can be so easily updated

Pros: some adaptable content with no developer, can build MVPs for e-commerce, cheaper than custom sites

Cons: more expensive than HTML, no customization, often need to build new site from scratch as company grows, mostly only suitable for MVPs

Who it’s best for: companies building MVPs to be rebuilt once bigger investment is secured, basic e-commerce, blogs
</ParagraphWithImage>

<ParagraphWithImage imageName="custom-development">
## Custom Development

Description: custom web development is the most useful way of building a website if you want to build a long-term business through an internet presence — basically everyone these days. For some businesses, like a local car dealership, this may be too much, because you sell most of your cars in person. However, if you want to make sales over the internet, you need at least a CMS website.

One of the advantages of developing a custom site as opposed to a basic CMS design is that there are no limitations based on the standard layout. You can build whatever elements you want to help increase your sales and build elements that give your company a real unique selling point. You can also update parts of your website, like a standard CMS site.

Another major benefit of building your own custom website is that they can be easily scaled. It’s important to note that how well the site can scale is largely dependent on the quality of the code. Standard CMS sites or low-quality code custom sites can get buggy and have delays as users increase. If you’re building a site to handle a large load of clients, it’s best to find a skilled team of developers to do it for you.

However, skilled developers can be quite expensive, which is difficult for some newer and smaller businesses to handle. If you’re just starting out and don’t have much funding, it might be expensive for you to build the site you want from the beginning, but it will save you time and money down the road.

Pros: completely customizable, scalable, can update content, better presentation of unique selling points,

Cons: can be pricey, requires experienced professional team, major updates more complex

Who it’s best for: established companies looking to build an online store, aggregators, startups looking to build an online company, news sites
</ParagraphWithImage>

<Separator type="color-line" lineColor="#D3D3FF" imageTitle="peopleWithBasket" imageName="peopleWithBasket"/>

## Conclusion

If you’re looking to build a new website, you have several options to choose from, and the one that’s right for you depends on many factors. As you grow your business, you may decide to change what you originally built. Choosing the right model to start with can save you time and money and help you grow faster.

Blog | CSSSR

Problems with documentation writing

HTML, CMS or Custom Development: Which is Better?

How Close Your Outsourced Team Should Be Located? Pros and Cons

How Close Your Outsourced Team Should Be Located? Pros and Cons

Offshore Web Development: Top Destinations For Singapore

How to Integrate Creative and Web Development

The Baltic E-Success: A Brief Introduction to the Estonian IT Industry

Split-Stack Web Development: Some Advantages of Separating Front-end from Back-end